Legal Opinion

Clifton Smith v. Dearborn Financial Services, Inc., and Dearborn Federal Credit Union

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 7, 1993No. 92-1432PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILBURN, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff Clifton Smith appeals the district court’s order finding that the Federal Credit Union Act (“FCUA”), 12 U.S.C. §§ 1751-1795k, provides no private cause of action and dismissing plaintiff’s federal claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). On appeal, the sole issue is whether the district court erred in holding that no private right of action exists for the enforcement of the FCUA, under either the statute or the applicable regulations, 12 C.F.R. § 721.2. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

I

Defendant…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Musson Theatrical, Inc., and Modernage Photo Service, Inc., for Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Federal Express CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  2. Parry v. Mohawk Motors of Michigan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  3. Wayne v. Village of SebringCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  4. Federal Defenders of New York, Inc. v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
  5. Loffredo v. Center for Addictive BehaviorsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API