Legal Opinion

Grand Union Mount Kisco Employees Federal Credit Union v. Kanaryk

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 16, 1994No. 89 Civ. 6890 (CHT)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND OPINION

TENNEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff, the Grand Union Mount Kisco Employees Federal Credit Union (the “Credit Union”), a federally insured and chartered credit union, brings this civil action against, its former treasurer, defendant Stanley Ka-naryk (“Kanaryk”), for common law fraud and breach of fiduciary duty in the management of the Credit Union’s financial affairs. The Credit Union is a New York corporation and Kanaryk is a citizen of Florida; therefore, diversity jurisdiction is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a) (1988). Plaintiff also claims jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Banco Nacional De Cuba v. SabbatinoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. California v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Laser Industries, Ltd. v. Reliant Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1996
  2. Rahl v. BandeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  3. Allen v. Westpoint-Pepperell, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  4. Allen v. WestPoint-Pepperell, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  5. LBBW v. Wells FargoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API