Legal Opinion
Adams v. City & County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 10, 1949No. Civ. No. 14168PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.
This is an appeal by the defendants city and county of San Francisco and the members and secretary of the city and county civil service commission from a judgment entered in favor of approximately 140 civil service machinist employees of the city and county, in which it was decreed by the trial court that plaintiffs should receive and defendants should grant to all of such employees who have had one year’s service a vacation of two calendar weeks annually with pay “as long as Section 151 of the Charter of said City and County or any other section of the Charter provides for a vacation of two…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bay Ridge Operating Co. v. AaronSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Steen v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- City & County of San Francisco v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Mid-Continent Petroleum Corporation v. KeenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
- People v. MoroneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Walker v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Tevis v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Killian v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Newmarker v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Sullivan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.