Legal Opinion
Mid-Continent Petroleum Corporation v. Keen
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided September 18, 1946No. 13261, 13267PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIDDICK, Circuit Judge.
C. R. Keen brought this action against the Mid-Continent Petroleum Corporation under section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 216 (b), to recover unpaid overtime compensation, liquidated damages, and attorneys fees. From a judgment in favor of Keen both parties have appealed.
Mid-Continent is a producer and wholesale distributor of petroleum products. It distributes the products of its refinery at Tulsa, Oklahoma, as well as petroleum products purchased from others, in a number of States including Iowa, Minnesota, and Wisconsin. Its northern…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- McLeod v. ThrelkeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Overstreet v. North Shore Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Pierce v. ReynoldsTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- United States v. Klinghoffer Bros. Realty Corp., Irving Jacobson and Albert KlinghofferCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Biggs v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Peter J. Brennan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Maxey's Yamaha, Inc., Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- Soler v. G & U, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.