Milliken v. Meyers
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This was a proceeding for a writ of mandate to compel the defendant, as city auditor of the city of Los Angeles, to audit a warrant in favor of plaintiff upon the treasurer of the city for the sum of $27.69, alleged to be a balance due plaintiff for services rendered during the month of August, 1913, as city deputy sealer of weights and measures.
Plaintiff appeals from the judgment rendered in favor of defendant.
In order to properly understand the ease, reference is had to various acts of the legislature and provisions of the-constitution affecting the question. As the constitution stood in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fragley v. PhelanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Popper v. BroderickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Graham v. Mayor & Bd. of Trs. of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Conlin v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Scott v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. DarbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- People v. RichardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Bowers v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977