Scott v. Boyle
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate directed to the auditor of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an original proceeding in mandamus in this court to compel the defendant, as auditor, to draw a warrant in favor of the plaintiff for the amount due him on his salary as deputy sealer of weights and measures of the city and county of San Francisco. The auditor claims that no such office exists and that the plaintiff’s appointment thereto is void.
Mandamus is an appropriate remedy to compel an auditing officer to issue a warrant for the compensation of the employees or officers of a city, county, or state, where the amount thereof is so fixed by law, ordinance, or otherwise that the act…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People ex rel. McCauley & Tevis v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Bannerman v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Doughterty v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Fowler v. PeirceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
- Lawrence v. BoothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Coulter v. PoolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Millholen v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Tevis v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Dufton v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Lockhart v. WoldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.