Legal Opinion

United States v. Gordon

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided June 12, 1953No. 1972PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Robert E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

The accused in this case was originally charged with the rape of a Korean national in violation of Article 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 50 USC § 714, and two relatively minor offenses not herein important. The principal offense grew out of the same *633incident described in United States v. Headspeth (No. 1973), 2 USCMA 635, 10 CMR 133 decided this date.. When the court which tried Headspeth returned a finding of guilty of indecent assault only, the convening authority reduced the charge against Gordon to indecent assault. Thereafter, at…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. LucasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1951
  2. United States v. SimmonsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  3. United States v. HeadspethUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. MasseyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  2. United States v. DickensonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  3. United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  4. United States v. FergusonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  5. United States v. KiddUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API