United States v. Ferguson
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
George W. Latimer, Judge:
In view of the principles announced by the Chief Judge and Judge Brosman in their separate opinions, the views expressed by the author judge do not fix the law of the case. The separate opinions will disclose the principles upon which there is agreement and only in those areas is the law settled. Because the majority of the Court is of the opinion that a rehearing should be granted, it is so ordered.
In publishing my views I find no good purpose could be served by recasting my opinion to meet the arguments advanced by my associates. The principles I chose to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Darr v. BurfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
- William L. Calley, Jr., Cross-Appellant v. Howard H. Callaway, Etc., Etc., Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. DickensonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
- United States v. RobertsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
- United States v. BlaylockUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.