Legal Opinion

United States v. Headspeth

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided June 12, 1953No. 1973PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

ROBERT E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

The accused, a member of the Marine Corps, was tried by general court-martial at Yongji-Ri, Korea, charged with rape of a Korean national in violation of Article 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 50 USC § 714. He was found guilty of the offense of indecent assault “by taking indecent, lewd, and lascivious liberties upon her person with intent to gratify his sexual desires,” in violation of Article 134, 50 USC § 728. Subsequent to approval by the convening authority, a Navy board of review, concluding that indecent assault is not a lesser…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. GordonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  2. United States v. FieldsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. BrittonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  2. United States v. HobbsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  3. United States v. HendersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  4. United States v. WilsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  5. United States v. SchoolfieldUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API