Legal Opinion

Russell v. Mitchell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1910No. 8951PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Skagit county, Joiner, J., entered November 22,1909, in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action of replevin.

1Per curiam

This is an action in replevin, tried by the court. The respondent moves the court to strike the statement of facts herein and affirm the judgment of the lower court, for the reason that the statement of facts was not filed and served within thirty days from the date of the entry of the judgment, and that no legal order for an extension of time for filing and service thereof had been made by the court. The record showing this state of facts, this motion must be sustained, by reason of the uniform holdings of this court.

The appellants, in answering this motion, rely upon the case of Dodds v.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Zindorf Construction Co. v. Western American Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. State v. SeatonWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Dodds v. GregsonWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  4. State v. YandellWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Wollin v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Seattle National Bank v. TrefethenWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Martin v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. McCrabbe v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Michaelson v. OvermeyerWashington Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API