Legal Opinion

Hunter v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1937No. 26247. En BancPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, C. J.

In a proceeding arising under the workmen’s compensation act, and after the original claim therein had been closed, the injured workman made application to the department of labor and industries to have his claim reopened and compensation allowed on the ground of aggravation of injuries. The application was denied, and the claimant thereupon appealed to the joint board, which, in turn, affirmed the order of the department. The claimant thereupon appealed to the superior court. After a hearing, the court made findings of fact and conclusions of law, and thereupon entered judgment reversing the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Abraham v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Tremblay v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Ek v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Stevich v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Dry v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Leschner v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  2. LeBire v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Hodgen v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Whittaker v. WellerWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Davis v. Combination Awning & Shutter Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1953

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API