Legal Opinion

Dwelly v. McReynolds

California Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1936No. S. F. 15522PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Further consideration of the merits of the appeals herein has led us to arrive at the same conclusions reached by the District Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division One, and we adopt as the opinion of this court the opinion of that court prepared by Mr. Justice Gray, pro tern. It is as follows:

“On the night of the accident, respondent Vernon E. Dwelly, as a state traffic officer, was patrolling, on his motorcycle, the state highway between San Rafael and Sausalito, in Marin county. The portion of this highway between Sausalito and Waldo was being reconditioned by…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Sharon v. Sharon, 11991 (Cal. 7-17-1889)California Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Reaugh v. Cudahy Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Wahlgreen v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Sawyer v. Southern California Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Smith v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1927

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. People v. McShannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Chronicle Publishing Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Tanzola v. De RitaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Samish v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Davies v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API