Legal Opinion

Tanzola v. De Rita

California Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1955No. L. A. 23642PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

— Defendant executor appeals from a judgment rendered by the court without a jury, by which plaintiff was awarded recovery of money allegedly loaned to defendant’s decedent, Angelo Pipolo, and evidenced by two checks. Plaintiff’s claim therefor had been rejected by defendant executor. We have concluded that the trial court did not err in admitting certain testimony of decedent’s surviving wife, claimed by defendant to be a privileged marital communication; that other claims of error are likewise without merit; and that the judgment should be affirmed.

Plaintiff alleged and the trial court…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Sharon v. Sharon, 11991 (Cal. 7-17-1889)California Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Mercantile Trust Co. v. Sunset Road Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Sampson v. SampsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  5. People v. MullingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. D. I. Chadbourne, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Chronicle Publishing Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. People v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Mize v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API