Legal Opinion

Wahlgreen v. Market Street Railway Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1901No. S.F. No. 2226PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Upon the argument following the rehearing in this case, it was urged, first, that the evidence showed beyond a conflict that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence. This matter is considered in the opinion heretofore rendered in Department, and the conclusion was there expressed, that the question of the contributory negligence of the plaintiff was one which, under the facts, was proper for the determination of the jury. Further consideration serves but to confirm the soundness of the Department's conclusion in this regard.

Appellant's second complaint is, that the following…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Herbert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Brandelius v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Thompson v. Los Angeles & San Diego Beach Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Schneider v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Hoy v. TornichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Kimic v. San Jose-Los Gatos Interurban Ry.California Supreme Court · 1909

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API