Legal Opinion

Smith v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1927No. Docket No. S.F. 11453PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

This action was brought to recover damages sustained by plaintiff Edward Smith for injuries caused by the alleged negligence of the defendants in the operation of an electric car or train belonging to the defendant corporation. The defendant Tom Kelley was the motorman in charge of said car at the time said plaintiff was injured, and the plaintiff, Vernon P. Peek, was the employer of the said Edward Smith at the date of the latter’s injury. Hereafter we will refer to Edward Smith as the plaintiff or appellant and the Southern Pacific Company as the defendant or respondent. At the close of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Reaugh v. Cudahy Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Varcoe v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Scott v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Giraude v. Elec. Improvement Co. of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Mann v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Anthony v. HobbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Austin v. Riverside Portland Cement Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Neel v. Mannings, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Gibson v. County of MendocinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Flores v. FitzgeraldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API