Legal Opinion
McClung v. City of Sumner
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 1, 2008No. 07-35231PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND DENYING REHEARING AND AMENDED OPINION
ORDER
The opinion filed on September 25, 2008, is amended as follows:
On slip Opinion page 13750, insert a new footnote 3 at the bottom of the page after the sentence that ends “... applies to Ordinance 1603.” (and renumber the subsequent footnotes):
We observe that the ordinance before us concerns a permit condition designed to mitigate the adverse effects of the new development. New construction increases the burden on the City’s sewer system and increases the loss that might result from flooding. After experiencing considerable…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Guatay Christian Fellowship v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- PhotoMedex, Inc. v. IrwinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- ADAM BROS. FARMING v. County of Santa BarbaraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Lyndsey Ballinger v. City of OaklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.