Legal Opinion

PhotoMedex, Inc. v. Irwin

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 14, 2010No. 07-56672PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLIFTON, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff PhotoMedex, Inc. appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants Dean Stewart Irwin and Ra Medical Systems, Inc. on Lanham Act claims for misleading advertising and on California state law claims for false advertising and unfair competition. These claims are based on allega tions of three separate misrepresentations made by Defendants regarding: (1) clearance by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to market their laser device, (2) the anticipated date their laser would be available for purchase, and (3) Irwin’s role as inventor…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Newcal Industries, Inc. v. IKON Office SolutionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Ellen Mendes v. Medtronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HBS International Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
  2. Robert Perez v. Nidek Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  3. Chavez v. Blue Sky Natural Beverage Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
  4. Munoz v. MabusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Viggiano v. Hansen Natural Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2013

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API