Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management Dist.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Alito
*599 Our decisions in Nollan v. California CoastalComm'n, 483 U.S. 825 , 107 S.Ct. 3141 , 97 L.Ed.2d 677 (1987), and Dolan v. City of Tigard, 512 U.S. 374 , 114 S.Ct. 2309 , 129 L.Ed.2d 304 (1994), provide important protection against the misuse of the power of land-use regulation. In those cases, we held that a unit of government may not condition the approval of a land-use permit on the owner's relinquishment of a portion of his property unless there is a "nexus" and "rough proportionality" between the government's demand and the effects of the proposed land use. In this case, the St. Johns…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by331 opinions
- Cedar Point Nursery v. HassidSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
- Aft Michigan v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
- Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene's Energy Group, LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- TORRES v. SEABOARD FOODS, LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- Parents for Privacy v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
326 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.