Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. City of Vallejo

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 19, 1932No. Docket No. 4520PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, P. J.

This is an action for damages brought by plaintiff, a minor of the age of nine years, through his guardian ad litem, against the defendant municipality, under subdivision 2 of the Statutes of 1923, page 675, for certain personal injuries received by plaintiff as the result of a fall from an alleged dangerous and defective slide maintained in the public playgrounds of the defendant, City of Vallejo.

The case having been called for trial, a jury was impaneled and evidence adduced. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s case defendant moved for a nonsuit, which motion was granted and judgment of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gorman v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. Hook v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Dawson v. Tulare Union High SchoolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Huff v. Compton City Grammar School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Stone v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Ziegler v. Santa Cruz City High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Plaza v. City of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Belcher v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Seybert v. County of ImperialCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API