Bruner v. Hegyi
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Lester T. Price, Judge Presiding. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff for $810, and interest, for work performed and materials supplied in setting in place the tile work for defendant’s residence.
The agreement, which was in writing, executed by defendant and plaintiff, provides that the “work must be satisfactory to the owner.”
The court found that the tile furnished by plaintiff was of the best quality, and that the work was done in a good workmanlike manner. It seems, however, that after the tile was set in place and through no defect in the workmanship or material, but probably because, as was intimated…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Handy v. BlissMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Doll v. . NobleNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Erikson v. WardIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
- Gladding, McBean & Co. v. MontgomeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Bryan Elevator Co. v. LawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mattei v. HopperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Thomas Haverty Co. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Sloan v. StearnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Weisz Trucking Co. v. Emil R. Wohl ConstructionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Rowe v. Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.