Dickey v. Gibson
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Stanislaus County. William 0. Minor, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion. i.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
This is an action to foreclose a mortgage. Plaintiff had judgment of foreclosure, and Crecencia Gibson, as executrix, appeals.
The contention of the appellant is, that a portion of the mortgaged premises were, and are, the homestead of said appellant and of Samuel Gibson, her testator, and that, as to such homestead, the mortgage of the plaintiff and respondent herein never was, and is not now, a lien thereon.
The following facts will serve to illustrate the contention:
In April, 1875, Samuel Gibson was the owner of all the land described in the mortgage herein, and resided thereon…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Egan v. EganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Sheehy v. MilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Bostwick v. McEvoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Sanders v. RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Tyrrell v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Estate of GoldbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- In Re the Estate of FathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Youlian v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- State Ex Rel. Melbourne State Bank v. WrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Erickson v. Stockton & Tuolumne Cty. R.R.California Supreme Court · 1905
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.