Legal Opinion
J. D. Ferry Co. v. Macbeth Engineering Corp.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 4, 1951No. Civ. A. No. 3862PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOLLMER, District Judge.
Plaintiff filed and served a. complaint charging the defendants with infringement of ten patents. These patents contain in the aggregate two hundred’ one claims.
Defendants, pursuant to Rule 12(e) of the Federal Rules of ’Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., have moved for a more definite statement of the complaint requesting the court to require plaintiff to specify with particularity which of the patent claims have been infringed. Defendants also moved that plaintiff be required to state the specific steps in defendants’ process and the specific parts or elements of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- A. B. Dick Co. v. Underwood Typewriter Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1916
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. ByrnesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939
- National Nut Co. of California v. Kelling Nut Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1945
- Midwest Mfg. Co. v. Filter Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1935
- Bonney Supply Co. v. HeltzelDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fischer & Porter Co. v. Sheffield Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1962
- Lincoln Laboratories, Inc. v. Savage Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1960