Legal Opinion
Harvey v. City of Holtville
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 14, 1969No. Civ. 9195PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dismissal following an order sustaining defendant’s general demurrer to her amended complaint seeking damages for injuries proximately caused by the dangerous condition of defendant’s property.
It appears the contention urged by defendant through its general demurrer was the complaint did not allege the presentation of a claim within the time prescribed by Government Code section 911.2 or the extended time provided by sections 911.4 and 911.6. The court sustained the demurrer and granted plaintiff 20 days to amend. Thereupon plaintiff petitioned the court,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Matteson v. WagonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Greenstone v. Claretian Theological SeminaryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Amestoy v. Elec. Rapid Transit Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
- Cake v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Bradford Investment Co. v. JoostCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Kiseskey v. Carpenters' Trust for Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- U. S. Financial v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- C & H. FOODS CO. v. Hartford Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- Wozniak v. Peninsula HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Bank of America v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.