Legal Opinion

Burgess v. Crump

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 16, 1923No. 13010PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKennameb, J.

George C. Crump, the defendant in error, has filed motion to dismiss this appeal prosecuted by John Burgess and Jaenette Burgess, plaintiffs in error, and for grounds of the motion states that this action was instituted in the district court of Seminole county by the defendant in error, as plaintiff in the trial court, to recover upon a promissory note secured by chattel mortgage on personal property. The petition filed by the plaintiff in the district court was in usual form for an action to recover upon a promissory note, and had attached to it as exhibits copies of the note and mortgage…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bilby v. CochranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Bilby v. National Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Mo.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Buell v. Oil Well Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. Miller v. Drumm Commission Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kinnear v. DennisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Security Benefit Ass'n v. LloydSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Burden v. StephensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. McGrath v. DurhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  5. Price v. PrestonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API