Legal Opinion

Bilby v. National Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Mo.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 2, 1916No. 7920PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from District Court, Hughes County; R. W. Higgins, Special Judge. Action by the National Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Mo., against N. V. Bilby and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, C. J.

This cause comes on to be heard upon a motion to dismiss the proceeding in error, upon the ground that it was frivolous and taken for the purpose of .delay only. We think the motion to dismiss is well taken and should be sustained. It is impossible to distinguish the cause and circumstances attending the proceedings of the trial court in the case at bar from Bilby v. Cochran et al., 47 Okla. 545, 149 Pac. 143, wherein a motion to dismiss the appeal was sustained upon the same ground. In that' case it was held:

“Where plaintiff sues upon a promissory note and. defendant answers by an unverified…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bilby v. CochranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Burgess v. CrumpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Edge v. Security Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Buell v. Oil Well Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. Crabtree v. American Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API