Legal Opinion

Buell v. Oil Well Supply Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 14, 1919No. 10152PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from District Court. Greek County; Ernest B. Hughes, Judge. Action by Oil Well Supply Company against J. Garfield Buell on promissory note. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant brings error.

1Per curiam

On motion to dismiss the appeal it appears defendant in error, Oil Wei! Supply Company, brought suit upon a prom issory note against plaintiff in error, J. Garfield Buell. The petition was verified, a copy of the note attached as an exhibit and made a part of the petition. Defendant Buell by way of answer filed an unverified general denial. Upon motion of plaintiff, judgment was rendered on the pleadings, from which judgment this appeal was prosecuted. Under the provisions of section 4759, Rev. Laws 1910, the allegations of the petition must be taken as true since the answer, by way of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bilby v. CochranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Bilby v. National Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Mo.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Burgess v. CrumpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Edge v. Security Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Bilbo v. SullivanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Crabtree v. American Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API