Legal Opinion

Kinnear v. Dennis

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 12, 1924No. 12592PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

LOGSDON, O.

In the petition in error herein nine assignments are made, but in tbe view taken of tbe case here it is only necessary to consider tbe seventh, which reads as follows:

“The court erred in refusing to grant a postponement or to continue the trial until such time as counsel for defendant was so recovered from his illness as to be able to proceed with the trial, or until other counsel could have time for preparation.’-’

An examination of the record in this case as it relates to the above assignment of error shows substantially the following: That the trial of this cause was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Murray v. BuellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. EasthamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Pierce v. EngelkemeierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
  4. Elliott v. CoggswellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. WestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. ChappleArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Abel v. TisdaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. Casciato v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Sneed v. SneedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  5. In Re Guardianship of DeereSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API