Legal Opinion
Frank v. Crescent Wharf & Warehouse Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 6, 1920No. Civ. No. 3595PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD, P. J., pro tem.
This action was brought upon a bond given for the faithful performance of the covenants of a charter-party of the steamer “F. A. Kilburn”; at the time the steamer was owned by plaintiff. He had judgment against both defendants and they appeal.
The covenants, in particular, to which our attention is directed by appellants, are:
“7th. The party of the second part shall pay all costs of operating and maintaining the said steamer, (except as hereinafter provided), and upon the expiration of this charter the said steamer shall be delivered back to the party of the first part…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pignaz v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- The ValenciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Burk v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Allen v. HanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Fowler v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Schlitz v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Van Camp Sea Food Co., Inc. v. NewbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Ripley Improvement Co. v. Hellman Commercial Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- State Credit Corp. v. RangerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Riley v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925