Burk v. City of Santa Cruz
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Mary N. Burk sued to quiet title to a tract of land situated in the city of Santa Cruz. The defendant, the city of Santa Cruz, asserted that “it was the owner and entitled to a right of way for street and sewer purposes' over those certain public streets” delineated upon the map known as Garfield Park No. 1, filed June 7, 1890, and named Bethany Circle, Walk Circle, and Raymond Circle. Further, defendant “avers the fact to be that the said streets herein-above mentioned have been dedicated as public streets by said defendant and that the same have been accepted by the city of Santa Cruz and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of San Francisco v. CanavanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Chapman v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- City & County of San Francisco v. GroteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Clarke v. HuberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Cerf v. PflegingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Cox Cable San Diego, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Fair Oaks Bank v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Lantz v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Palos Verdes Corp. v. Housing AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Lyons v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.