Legal Opinion
Ripley Improvement Co. v. Hellman Commercial Trust & Savings Bank
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 12, 1928No. Docket No. 5789PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAHN, J., pro tem.
The action which gives rise to this appeal is one wherein plaintiff, formerly Blythe Construction Company, sought to enjoin the sale of certain lands held under trust deeds as security for the payment of two promissory notes, one for the sum of $10,000 and one for $15,000, executed by plaintiff to the defendant Peoples Trust & Savings Bank of Riverside. Subsequent to the filing of the suit the $10,000 note was disposed of and the case went to trial upon the $15,000 note and the property described in the trust deed securing it. This note was dated August 14, 1918, and made…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McKean v. German-American Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Moore v. GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Burk v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Frank v. Crescent Wharf & Warehouse Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
3Cited by4 opinions
- North Hollywood Mortgage Co. v. North American Bond & Mortgage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Peerless Motor Co. v. Sterling Finance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Estate of Waters v. HoadleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
- Law Credit Co. v. Merchants National Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935