Legal Opinion

Fowler v. Smith

California Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1852PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of the City of San Francisco. This cause was first heard in this Court, at January term, 1852, and will he found reported in this volume, at page 39, et seq.; to that report we refer for the facts of the case and the arguments of counsel.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Superior Court of the City of San Francisco. This cause was first heard in this Court, at January term, 1852, and will he found reported in this volume, at page 39, et seq.; to that report we refer for the facts of the case and the arguments of counsel. After the decision of the Court, the appellant petitioned for a rehearing; and the argument of counsel in favour of the petition, is also reported, ante, page 50. The petition was granted at January term, 1852, and the case ordered to he reinstated upon the calendar. At October term, 1852, the following opinions were delivered.…

1Opinion of the Court

Murray, Chief Justice.

I am of opinion that the judgment of the Court below should be affirmed, for the reasons stated in my opinion filed in this cause, February 4th, 1852, and cannot give my assent to any other rule of decision, upon the questions involved.

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cumberland Capital Corp. v. PattyTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Sterrett v. SweeneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Frank v. Crescent Wharf & Warehouse Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. Krouse v. KrouseIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Macoleta v. PackardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API