Ramsden v. Hawkinson Gas Service Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtConnor T. Hansen, J.
Summary judgment should not be granted unless the material facts are not in dispute, no competing inferences can arise, and the law that resolves the issue is clear and overrides any other issues either factual or legal which may appear. Fox v. Wand (1971), 50 Wis. 2d 241, 184 N. W. 2d 81.
When the trial court, in the exercise of its judicial discretion, is of the opinion that there are or may be material disputed facts, or that conflicting permissible inferences can arise from undisputed facts and thus denies a motion for summary judgment, generally, this court will not interfere with the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Schnabl v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Matthew v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Fox v. WandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Edlebeck v. BarnesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Estate of Becker v. BeckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lawver v. BolingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Maynard v. Port Publications, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Lecus v. American Mutual Insurance Co. of BostonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Schlosser v. Allis-Chalmers Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- American Orthodontics Corp. v. G & H Insurance Agency, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.