Legal Opinion

Kroske v. Anaconda American Brass Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1975No. 148 (1974)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.

The following issues are presented on appeal:

1. Does Carriers’ insurance policy afford coverage for “loading and unloading?”

2. Must the entirety of Carriers’ policy be disclosed to the trial court for purposes of the motion for summary judgment?

3. Was summary judgment precluded by hearsay and conclusory statements in the affidavit of the moving party ?

4. Was summary judgment precluded because the affidavit of the moving party was made by counsel?

Coverage for “loading and unloading.”

The general peril insured by Carriers was stated in its policy as follows:

“(1) To pay on behalf of the insured…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lukaszewicz v. Concrete Research, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Allstate Insurance Co. v. Truck Insurance ExchangeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Drewek v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Ranous v. HughesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Diggins v. TherouxMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hopper v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Rabe v. Outagamie CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Krieg v. Dayton-Hudson Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Mullenberg v. Kilgust Mechanical, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Brown County v. Brown County Taxpayers AssociationWisconsin Supreme Court · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API