Krause v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.
It is the contention of the appellant Insurance Company on this appeal that the uncontroverted facts, which are set forth in the affidavits considered by the trial court in passing on the motion for summary judgment, established that the plaintiff was entitled to workmen’s compensation benefits for his injuries, and, therefore, the exclusion clause of Western’s policy was effective to bar any action on such policy by the plaintiff.
The order appealed from, which denied Western’s motion for summary judgment, grounded such denial upon the following two grounds:(1) That the affidavits in support…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Salmon v. Bagley Laundry Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1955
- Village of Butler v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- American Motors Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Rock County v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
- Fuller v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Kerl v. Dennis Rasmussen, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Whitehurst v. Rainbo Baking CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- West Side Bank v. Marine National Exchange BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Szuszka v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Sweet v. KoloskySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.