Legal Opinion

Szuszka v. City of Milwaukee

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1961PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

The briefs filed by the parties, and the oral arguments made by counsel before this court, have been directed to the issue of whether plaintiffs are barred from prosecuting the instant action under the rule of election of remedies. The question of whether the order appealed from is appealable has not been raised. However, parties cannot, either by failure to raise the question or by consent, confer jurisdiction upon an appellate court to review an order which is not appealable. Jaster v. Miller (1955), 269 Wis. 223, 234, 69 N. W. (2d) 265; Mitler v. Associated Contractors (1958), 3 Wis. (2d)…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jaster v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Mitler v. Associated Contractors, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Krause v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  4. St. Patrick's Congregation v. Home Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Gill v. HermannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Shetney v. ShetneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Bavarian Soccer Club, Inc. v. PiersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. City of Milwaukee v. CohenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Village of Fontana-On-Geneva Lake v. HoagWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Heritage Mutual Insurance v. ThomaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API