Legal Opinion

Clark v. Redlich

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 10, 1957No. Civ. 5299PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COUGHLIN, J. pro tem. *

In 1945, the plaintiffs Clark purchased a parcel of land, near the intersection of Lincoln Avenue and Hanson Street in Orange County, together with an easement of ingress and egress over adjoining land owned by the defendants Redlich. This easement had been created in 1929 by a written agreement between the prior owners of these properties, but never has been used. Instead, the Clarks have used a lane or road, originally described as a “two- wheel wagon track,” along the southerly boundary of the land now owned by the defendants Seal.

The Clarks built two houses upon…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Teel v. GaskillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Kennedy v. IsenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. O'BANION v. BorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Clarke v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Gerhard v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Lynch v. GlassCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Haley v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Marshall v. MarshallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Guerra v. PackardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API