Legal Opinion

Higgins v. Classen

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 28, 1936No. 22641PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OSBORN, Y. C. J.

This is an action 'in equity instituted in the district court of Oklahoma county by B. W. Higgins, Jr., and a number of other persons, hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs, against Ella D. Clas-sen. hereinafter referred to as defendant. In this action 'it is sought to reform a deed executed by R. W. Higgins to Anton H. Olassen. The trial court found in favor of defendant, and plaintiffs have appealed.

Plaintiffs are the heirs of R. W. Higgins, deceased. Defendant is the widow, sole legatee and devisee of Anton H. Classen, deceased.

The facts are that in April, 1889, R. W.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cassidy v. GouldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Wilson v. OlsenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Indian Land & Trust Co. v. OwenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. American-First National Bank v. PetersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. City of Muskogee v. NicholsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cuneo v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Cunnius v. FieldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  3. Crabb v. ChisumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Oklahoma City Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. CliftonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Pasotex Petroleum Company, a Corporation v. M.B. CameronCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API