Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Olsen
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 30, 1934No. 21742PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.
This action was commenced in the district court of Oklahoma county by Addie Baker to quiet her title to an undivided one-half interest in the mineral rights on 80 acres of land in Oklahoma county. The rights of the plaintiff were admitted by all. The dispute was between defendants in the trial court, and this appeal is taken by R. H. Wilson, Dora May Humphreys, G. J. Humphreys, and Permelia B. Blakeney, nee Wynne, who were defendants in the trial court, and who appear herein as plaintiffs in error. ■ The defendant in error, R. Olsen, was also a defendant in the trial court. Complaint is here…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Fraley, Adm'r v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Taylor v. SuttonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
- Raley v. Umatilla CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1887
- Creek Land & Improvement Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Gypsy Oil Co. v. SchonwaldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Burns v. BastienSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Carroll v. BowenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Jennings v. Amerada Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Melton v. SneedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Wynn v. Sklar & Phillips Oil CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.