Legal Opinion
Cuneo v. Champlin Refining Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 29, 1936No. 25665PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBusby, J.
This case involves the ownership of the oil and gas rights under a portion of the right of way of the St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company in Oklahoma (’it.v, Okla.
The dispute is between the present owners of adjacent property and the heirs of the former owner of the entire property who originally granted the railway a right of way easement. The deeds through which (he adjacent properly owners claim did not specifically grant to them the fee under the right of way. Neither did such deeds preserve such qualified fee to the original grantor and his heirs.
We are chiefly concerned with the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Rio Bravo Oil Co. v. WeedTexas Supreme Court · 1932
- Paine v. Consumers' Forwarding & Storage Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
- Van Winkle v. . Van WinkleNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Marks v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925
- Marland v. GillespieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Cantley v. Gulf Production Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1940
- Roeder Co. v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. L v. French Truck Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Oklahoma City v. Local Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Kassner v. Alexander Drug Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.