Cunnius v. Fields
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
HODGES, Justice.
The problem under consideration in this appeal arose out of the execution and de-, livery of a warranty deed which purported to transfer the surface and surface estate with a reservation of a ⅛⅛ mineral interest. It was later discovered that the grantors owned a ½ mineral interest.
The plaintiffs are the heirs (surviving husband and children) of one Ada May Fields, who died intestate leaving the property in question. The land comprising 65 acres had been in the family of the intestate since it was patented. Plaintiffs con veyed by warranty deed to the defendants the property…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hitt v. HittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Nelson v. DaughertySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Higgins v. ClassenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Good v. CohlmiaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Green v. VotawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- CALVERT v. SWINFORDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- Twin Forks Ranch, Inc. v. BrooksNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
- Messner v. MooreheadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Haslem v. OttosenUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- Twin Forks Ranch, Inc. v. BrooksNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.