Legal Opinion

Fernando Ruiz v. Affinity Logistics Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 16, 2014No. 12-56589PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:

This is the second time this case is before us. Plaintiff-Appellant Ruiz and putative class members (collectively, “drivers”) are California residents who worked for Defendant-Appellee Affinity Logistics (“Affinity”), a Georgia corporation. Drivers allege that Affinity wrongfully classified them as independent contractors; failed to pay them sick leave, vacation, holiday, and severance wages; and improperly charged them workers’ compensation insurance fees. The outcome of these state law causes of action depends on whether the drivers were employees or…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. S. G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Narayan v. EGL, INC.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. Estrada v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Tieberg v. Unemployment Ins. App. Bd.California Supreme Court · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Jones v. Royal Admin. Servs., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. Alexander v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Justice v. Rockwell Collins, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2015
  4. Edward Slayman v. Fedex Ground Package SystemCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Cotter v. Lyft, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API