Justice v. Rockwell Collins, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER -
AIKEN, Chief Judge:
Defendant Rockwell Collins, Inc. (“Rockwell”) moves for summary judgment on all'of plaintiff Tristan Justice's claims pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. Defendant Naresh Agarwal (“Agarwal”) filed a separate, partial motion for summary judgement. In addition, plaintiff moves to impose sanctions. For the reasons set forth below, defendants’ motions are granted and plaintiffs motion is denied, and this case is dismissed.
BACKGROUND1
In February 2010, Agarwal, a 67-year-old Systems Engineer at Rockwell, was *1124transferred from San Jose, California, to the company’s…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- (PC) Black v. ThompsonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- (PC) Saldana v. St. AndreDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Adan v. City of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024
- Allen v. Commissioner Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2021
- Anotta v. Oregon Department of Environmental QualityDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.