Legal Opinion
Jones v. Royal Admin. Servs., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 9, 2017No. 15-17328PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The prior opinion filed on August 9, 2017, and reported at 866 F.3d 1100 is hereby amended concurrent with the filing of an Amended Opinion today.
No petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc was filed within the original time period, and that time period has now expired. No subsequent petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc shall be filed.
N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
Charles Jones and Josh Watson seek to hold Royal Administration Services, Inc. ("Royal") liable for several telephone calls made in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA"), 47 U.S.C. § 227, by…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Community for Creative Non-Violence v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Campbell-Ewald Co. v. GomezSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- National Labor Relations Board v. United Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Kristen Schertzer v. Bank of America, NaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- California River Watch v. City of VacavilleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Airlines for America v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- California River Watch v. City of VacavilleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Husayn v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.