Legal Opinion

S. G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial Relations

California Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1989No. S003956PublishedCited by 260 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EAGLESON, J.

We ordered review to decide whether agricultural laborers engaged to harvest cucumbers under a written “sharefarmer” agreement are “independent contractors” exempt from workers’ compensation coverage.1 Our answer has implications for the employer-employee relationship upon which other state social legislation depends.2

The grower claims the “sharefarmer” harvesters are independent contractors under the statutory “control-of-work” test, because they manage their own labor, share the profit or loss from the crop, and agree in writing that they are not employees. After taking…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Rutherford Food Corp. v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. United States v. SilkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Bartels v. BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Michael Lauritzen and Marilyn Lauritzen, Individually and Doing Business as Lauritzen FarmsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by260 opinions

  1. Martinez v. CombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Privette v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Dynamex Operations W., Inc. v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2018
  4. O'Connor v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
  5. Hendy v. LosseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

255 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API