Legal Opinion

Narayan v. EGL, INC.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 13, 2010No. 07-16487PublishedCited by 105 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Appellees’ Petition for Panel Rehearing is granted for the limited purpose of amending the Opinion, without further oral argument.

The Opinion filed July 13, 2010, slip op. 10069, is amended as follows:

On page 10084, line 20: <This is not all.> is deleted.

On page 10085, second indented paragraph, first sentence: <The fact that the Drivers here had contracts “expressly acknowledging that they were independent contractors” is simply not significant under California’s test of employment. > is replaced with <That the Drivers here had contracts “expressly acknowledging that they were…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  3. United Steelworkers of America v. Phelps Dodge Corporation, a New York Corporation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. Davis v. Team Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Benchmark Electronics, Inc. v. J.M. Huber Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by105 opinions

  1. Young v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Pyramid Technologies, Inc. v. Hartford Casualty Insurance CoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Ajamian v. Cantorco2e. L.P.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Ruiz v. Affinity Logistics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Eric Brant v. Schneider National Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API