Legal Opinion

Burke v. Mead

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1902No. 19,540PublishedCited by 49 opinions

Appeal from Wabash Circuit Court; II. B. Shively, Judge. Suit by Benjamin E. Burke and others against Merritt C. Mead and others. Erom a judgment for defendants, plaintiffs appeal. Transferred from Appellate Court, under §1337u Burns 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtGillett, J.

— The appellants filed their complaint in five paragraphs to obtain a decree for the specific performance of a contract by appellees. The latter successfully demurred to each paragraph of the complaint. A decree followed, that appellants take nothing by their suit, and the latter assign errors, based on said rulings on demurrer. Each paragraph of the complaint sets out, either in the body of the paragraph or as an exhibit thereto, a writing that it is alleged that appellees executed to appellants. The following is a copy of said writing: “Marion, Indiana, May 13, 1899. This agreement, made…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Peabody v. Chicago Gas Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Colson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1817
  3. Stanton v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  4. Blanchard v. Detroit, Lansing & Lake Michigan RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  5. State ex rel. Clapp v. Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Wolvos v. MeyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Scott's S&S Incorporated v. Steak N Shake Enterprises, IncCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  3. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. GossettIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Howard v. AdkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Warner v. MarshallIndiana Supreme Court · 1905

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API