Legal Opinion
McCain v. Hartford Live Stock Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided November 25, 1925PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVaeseb, J.
The defendant submits several contentions that the judgment of nonsuit is correct. We need only consider one of these, to wit, the provision in the contract that the policy does not cover animals not in good health and entirely free from sickness or injury when the policy is delivered to plaintiff. The policy makes the application, and its provisions are a part of the policy itself. It is, therefore, just as much a part thereof as if written in the policy. Bobbitt v. Ins. Co., 66 N. C., 70; Ormond v. Ins. Co., 96 N. C., 158; Cuthbertson v. Ins. Co., 96 N. C., 480, 486; Fuller v. Knights of…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- American Trust Co. v. Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Life & Casualty Ins. v. KingTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
- Carr v. DuvalSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
- Grabbs v. Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- Jones v. Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. Philip Morris USA Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. HoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Beth Cosey v. The Prudential Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- McDowell Motor Co. v. New York Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Peirson v. American Hardware Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.