Colley v. Pearl Assur. Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gailor
This is an appeal by the insurance company from a decree for $46d.95 with interest, against it in favor of complainant on a policy of automobile insurance described in the original bill as “insuring against loss of or damage to the automobile except by collision, but including fire, theft and windstorm. ’ ’
The cause having been tried below on a stipulation of facts, the appeal has come directly to this court. We do not know the grounds on which the chancellor based his ^decree in favor of the complainant, since the record contains no opinion of his, and the recitals of the decree furnish us…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bird v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Hyer v. Inter-Insurance Exchange of the Automobile ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Maness v. Life & Casualty InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
- Rea v. Motors Ins. CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
- Great Eastern Casualty Co. v. SolinskyTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- English v. Virginia Surety Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1954
- Lunn v. Ind. Lumbermen's Mut Ins. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1947
- Spradlin v. Columbia Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1950
- American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pa. v. CutshallTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
- Miesen v. BolichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.