Legal Opinion

Colley v. Pearl Assur. Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1946PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gailor

This is an appeal by the insurance company from a decree for $46d.95 with interest, against it in favor of complainant on a policy of automobile insurance described in the original bill as “insuring against loss of or damage to the automobile except by collision, but including fire, theft and windstorm. ’ ’

The cause having been tried below on a stipulation of facts, the appeal has come directly to this court. We do not know the grounds on which the chancellor based his ^decree in favor of the complainant, since the record contains no opinion of his, and the recitals of the decree furnish us…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bird v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Hyer v. Inter-Insurance Exchange of the Automobile ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. Maness v. Life & Casualty InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Rea v. Motors Ins. CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Great Eastern Casualty Co. v. SolinskyTennessee Supreme Court · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. English v. Virginia Surety Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Lunn v. Ind. Lumbermen's Mut Ins. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Spradlin v. Columbia Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1950
  4. American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pa. v. CutshallTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Miesen v. BolichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API