Legal Opinion
American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pa. v. Cutshall
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided June 5, 1959PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Tomlinson
The sole question here is what is the proper construction of that provision hereinafter quoted of an accident insurance policy of which Vestal Cutshall is a beneficiary. Because the facts are stipulated, the appeal of the Insurance Company is directly to this Court.
"While Cutshall was riding as a passenger on a motorcycle being operated upon a public highway the operator thereof lost control of it. The result was that this motorcycle skidded directly into the path of an oncoming automobile. By reason of the resulting collision Cutshall
“was thrown from the motorcycle over the hood of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Maness v. Life & Casualty InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
- Colley v. Pearl Assur. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1946
- Harley v. Life & Casualty Insurance Co. of TennesseeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
- Barnes v. Great American Ind Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1938
3Cited by15 opinions
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1973
- Essex House v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1975
- Bates v. United Security Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
- Bowab v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. JohnsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1961
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.