Legal Opinion
Great Eastern Casualty Co. v. Solinsky
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided December 15, 1923PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney
For a statement of the case we quote from the brief of defendants in error as follows:
“Responding to what was thought to he a signal light to stop at a railroad crossing the driver of the Cadillac Suburban automobile of defendants in error suddenly applied the brakes. At the time of the accidental collision the machine was traveling at the rate of thirty to thirty-five miles per hour on the Nolensville Pike. The scene of the accident was in Davidson county, but some distance outside of the corporate limits of the city of Nashville. The Nolensville Pike had been oiled and loose gravel spread…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- French v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- Bell v. American Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
- Harris v. American Casualty Co. of ReadingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
- Universal Service Co. v. American InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Kelly v. Fidelity Mutual Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Travelers Ins. Co. v. AnsleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
- Lunn v. Ind. Lumbermen's Mut Ins. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1947
- Ringo v. Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1933
- Spradlin v. Columbia Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1950
- American Automobile Ins. Co. v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.